My Odeo Channel (Code: 11a1db75c4117aa5)

Earthquake Insurance

2010-01-25 by Eva Rosenberg

Today TaxMama reads an article from Al Tompkins at Poynter.org who ponders “Is earthquake insurance worth the cost?”

Well my friends, that’s an excellent question.

And I am expecting, and welcome, rebuttals from insurance agents!

Back before the Northridge earthquake in California, I was of the firm belief that anyone in California who owned property and did not carry earthquake insurance was flat out irresponsible. We all know earthquakes are coming; take responsibility.

Since the Northridge Quake, though, earthquake coverage has gotten bizarre. The primary exclusion from coverage is 10% – 15% of the value of your home. It used to be more like $5,000 – $10,000. Now, that means your coverage will not pay a dime until you sustain over about $20,000 in damages. (Note: Median home price in California is over $300,000 – assume 1/3 for value of land – http://www.svdaily.com/realestateprices.html ).

Most homes don’t sustain that much damage. For instance, the home we bought only lost a chimney. It cost about $5,000 for the previous owners to replace it. For most people, except those right near the epicenter – or specifically along a fault line, damage to the physical property was under $10,000.

Reimbursements for personal property damage, living expenses for temporary housing, and a variety of other reimbursements have dropped dramatically to a few thousand dollars. You used to be able to get coverage that would pay for housing for at least one year; personal property for the limits you set, etc.

The cost for the coverage tends to be on the high side – close to $1,200 for that median priced home.

Since really powerful quakes don’t seem to hit the same area more often than every 20 years or so, consider banking your premium for those 20 years, instead of paying it to an insurance company. Even if you earn as little as 2% a year after taxes, compounded annually, you’d have well over $30,000 waiting for you when that earthquake hits. Naturally, over 20 years, interest rates will rise, so the balance will be much higher. http://www.dinkytown.net/java/CompoundSavings.html

The only trick is to remember to pay yourself each year!

Naturally, if you are near a major fault line or in a particularly active earthquake area – do both. Pay yourself each year, so you have the money to cover the deductible AND carry the coverage!

You can apply this same logic to other kinds of insurance coverage whose benefits have diminished while costs have risen, like flood coverage.

And remember, you can find answers to all kinds of questions about what if decisions and other tax issues, free. Where? Where else? At TaxMama.com.

[Note: If you were subscribed to the e-mailed TaxQuips, you’d be getting other exciting news and tips by e-mail, that never appear on the site. Please click on the subscribe link and join us.]

Download the MP3 (0:00min, 0MB) or listen now...

Ask TaxMama
Where taxes are fun and answers are free
www.TaxQuips.com
The number ONE free tax podcast online
Al Tompkins
Morning Meeting for Journalists
Silicon Valley Daily
California Median Home Prices
DinkyTown.net
Investment Calculator


All Comments RSS

  1. Carol Topp, CPA Says:

    We live in Ohio which sits on the New Madrid fault. We've been told that if and when a quake hits the midwest it will have far reaching effects because the plate is so huge and with no cracks to break up the quake.

    We pay $75 a year for earthquake insurance on our $250,000 home and it covers exterior masonry (like a chimney). We think that's pretty cheap insurance.

Your Comment

No audio file allowed


Google Custom Search



create & buy custom tax nerd products at Zazzle